Hi, ![]()
here comes another hand. This time quite a standard situation I guess which I might have played really badly.
$0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
BB: $8.55 (VPIP: 37.74, PFR: 22.75, 3Bet Preflop: 5.71, Hands: 261)
UTG: $5.00
MP: $3.96
CO: $11.51
Hero (BTN): $6.07
SB: $5.02
SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05
Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has J♥ Q♣
fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.12, fold, BB calls $0.07
Flop: ($0.26, 2 players) Q♥ 7♦ 8♦
BB checks, Hero checks
Turn: ($0.26, 2 players) 4♣
BB bets $0.20, Hero calls $0.20
River: ($0.66, 2 players) 6♦
BB bets $0.50, Hero calls $0.50
OTF:
When playing I thought, that this might be a nice hand to check/call as it is neither good nor bad enough for a c-bet. In retrospect I think a value bet would have been the right choice. I am most likely ahead here and my hand should be good enough for at least one street of value. There also should be some equity on the board for villain's range, which I shouldn't let him realize for free.
As played I think I should have folded OTR. A lot of straights and flushes did complete here so a lot of his turn bluffing hands probably became value hands now which beat me. I really don't see a lot of suitable bluffs in his range left. Also bluffing seems to be not a good idea for villain, given that also some of my draws should have completed OTR. When it comes to SDV hands weaker then my top pair, I think he wouldn't have bet two streets with them. So there is not a lot left which I beat here.
Do you agree that c-betting OTF and folding OTR would have been the right play?