50E+R - Qq

imo raise size on flop is ok
turn ok too (u can also/i prefer to bet fold for protection+value from draws)
river i go for bigger bet => is very unlikely for unknown villain to check flush/str8 2 times BUT with your sizing (which is inducing)is very ugly i villain decide to get fancy and raise u, so i go for biger bet like 2400-2700 and fold if he raise

Hi all,

This deep I'm making it closer to 1900 on the flop. As played turn's fine but Rebuz is right and bet/folding it is reasonable too!

On the river I bet/fold but only slightly bigger. On the one hand we don't want to induce a raise from a bluff that we're going to fold to, on the other hand I don't expect us to get raised often at all! As a result I think that we need to maximise our value in this situation, and we will do that by using a smaller bet size.

When I bet this amount I will call a raise. I don`t think he will check turn and river often with T9 or flush.
I try to induce some bluff, because in his range, he don`t have a lot of hands which can call me.

I would have 3bet him slight higher also to around 1700, but ur min bet if fine also he has to call it.

i would also have fired another barrow at turn around 3rd of pot or just under , checking turn only gives BB a free card to possibly hit draw.

on the river as it was played I would have bet around 3/4 pot, if he raises that amount u can fold, although i dont think he would.

would you have called him if he raised your river bet or is he jammed your river bet? .............by raising 3/4 pot on river gives you a much better idea if he has it or not imo...

Calling a c/r seems too thin as I don't think opponents bluff in this spot very often. That being said, if you don't think your opponent checks the river with his nutted hands your line of reasoning is OK.

I prefer just betting bigger to get value from his bluffcatchers. Your approach is also OK against particularly spewy opponents. But standard fish won't bluff much here vs a small bet.