Hi, this is my first post here.
I have no hands for villain. I am a tight player. My EP raise is 9%.
Poker Stars, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
SB: $10.20 (102 bb)
BB: $10 (100 bb)
UTG+1: $24.24 (242.4 bb)
Hero (UTG+2): $12.01 (120.1 bb)
MP1: $10 (100 bb)
MP2: $10.97 (109.7 bb)
MP3: $9.01 (90.1 bb)
CO: $13.33 (133.3 bb)
BTN: $22.50 (225 bb)
Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with A
Q![]()
UTG+1 folds, Hero raises to $0.30, MP1 folds, MP2 calls $0.30, 5 folds
Flop: ($0.75) 9
J
A
(2 players)
Hero bets $0.50, MP2 calls $0.50
Turn: ($1.75) 4
(2 players)
Hero bets $1.16, MP2 calls $1.16
River: ($4.07) 7
(2 players)
Hero checks, MP2 checks
Spoiler
Results: $4.07 pot ($0.18 rake)
Final Board: 9
J
A
4
7
Hero showed A
Q
and won $3.89 ($1.93 net)
MP2 mucked A
T
and lost (-$1.96 net)
I checked, because I'don't think there are a lot of hands that I beat which would pay. Realistically the only hand I can expect is an AT, if that, and a bad player calling with an Ax from time to time. So I check, but I would have called a bet of up to 60% and this is what got me thinking. If he has a stronger hand he will bet here. Even if it is just an AK I expect him to bet. So if I am going to pay up the 2$ anyway, might as well bet first and fold to a re-raise. I lose the same amount of money, but this way I will get a bit of value out of an AT. Also there aren't a lot of busted draws or flushes to bluff bet on the river.
So what do you think? Am I underestimating the amount of time an AK would check back. Or is my intention of calling a bet on the river wrong and I should just check-fold?
Thank you