Originally posted by VorpalF2F
Originally posted by Harrier88
Originally posted by Harrier88
I'm happy to report that I did get started with NL 2-7 Single Draw tournaments, at least. Results weren't good yet, but I expected that much, and I'm willing to pay a bit of a "tuition fee" while I'm learning the ropes. This game requires nerves of steel, but it seems to be a decent option for the grind, I would like to stay at it for a while.
The phrase that fits is "more guts than a slaughterhouse".
The game is the essence of poker -- a combination of knowing the odds, and unbridled aggression.
What I've realized when I got back on track in Badugi last month was that in poker in general, it really pays to be fearless - which is not to be confused with being reckless.
To be reckless is to take foolish risks, either because you lack the understanding to properly evaluate the odds and rewards, or because you simply don't care to do it, which may sound stupid, but is more common and normal than one may think. It can often happen on tilt, when emotions override your capacity to reason, it may happen due to fatigue in a long session, and it is the modus operandi of the classic recreational "gamblefish", as they are called - as well as a good chunk of actual casino gamblers who voluntarily play games where the odds are stacked against them by design. It is also what I often end up doing in those weekly Hold'em freerolls I play with Prim, which are the last bastions of Hold'em for me, frequently making we wonder why that game is still popular - and especially how I could have once been passionate about it myself. Looks like this firmly puts me into that "gamblefish" category in that game, at least. ![]()
To be fearless, on the other hand, is to know the situation, to be aware that you may lose, but to still make the objectively best decisions in the face of the risk that is involved. In order to do that, you need to be skilled. Skills are what give you the ability to properly determine your odds and rewards, and I'd argue that bankroll management, which is another important factor, is also to be considered a skill. Not having these skills means that you won't be able to take these risks without automatically landing in the reckless category, since you were not able to ascertain the chances and rewards of the risk you took, or because you risked so much that it put you into an unreasonable risk of ruin despite favorable odds, to get back to the point about bankroll management.
I've been through my worst Badugi downswing yet this year, and as I had pointed out before, this and other smaller downswings before have often led me into a trap where I played overly cautious and only tried to wait for the really good hands after having come up short so often with the more marginally good hands. I may still play those good but not great hands, but give up at the first sign of resistance. The problem with that is that it's simply a losing strategy. It only pays off if you're lucky enough to have an opponent dealt another great hand that slightly loses to you - and that would need to happen several times in order to get a decent MTT result. You need to push those smaller edges too in order to have success. I had the skills to determine those edges, but I was not fearless, so it all went to waste.
And why was that? As I mentioned above, it was because emotions overrode my reasoning. I experienced many of those situations within a short time where my hands with marginal edges lost, and it eventually it made those spots seem like losing situations even though they weren't. Even after reading back up about the odds and ranges to improve my confidence, I may have correctly taken those risks again, only to come up short yet another time, making it seem like it really didn't work. In fact, it made it seem like my entire strategy wasn't working anymore. I did not conclude that through reason, but through emotions (or rather through reason being guided by emotions), and being impeded by that, I could not use my skills to play fearlessly - and instead adopted what was a losing strategy.
It can happen the other way around too. After making a bunch of overly cautious laydowns, possibly several against the same opponent, I may eventually end up getting frustrated with my own folding and take a risk that I shouldn't have. Again, emotions overriding my reason and leading to me making a reckless, not a fearless decision.
NL 2-7 Single Draw is still mostly uncharted territory to me, and while I believe that my feel for the situations in this game has improved, I still don't know enough to confidently evaluate my situation in most cases. In other words, I still lack the skills that are required for me to make those correct, fearless decisions, and as we pointed out, those really are the essence of that game, possibly more so than in any other form of poker. Not having these skills, I could only choose the reckless or overly cautious options, and having the choice between only the two of them, I usually erred on the side of caution. This may be better than the only alternative in this case, but it's still not how you win the game, especially because this one has antes.
As one commenter in the chat of Vorpal's stream who was railing my progress in a Badugi tournament once put it (I wish I had taken a screenshot, because it was pretty good):
Why is Harrier still in? Oh, I see - no antes.







VS