Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Is this the right play?

7 Posts
5 Users
1 Reactions
290 Views
upsssssss
Joined: 06.04.2011

https://gg.gl/j0e8k

Stats sb 21/21 3bet 38%


Reply
Quote
6 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Calling pre-flop in position against a min raise seems alright, but after the 5x raise of the SB I would fold.
Villain has most likely a really tight 3bet range out of position. Off course villain has a huge 3bet%, but not sure based on how many hands this is.

As played the turn is most likely a fold on the huge Cbet. You beat no value hands I think and not sure villain would bluff like this with in mind you get committed by a call or shove. Villain has invested more than half his starting stack on the turn.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
taavi1337
Joined: 29.05.2009

I don't like the preflop flat, I would go KQs+ there.


Reply
Quote
upsssssss
Joined: 06.04.2011

Normally I’d fold too if the villain had a reasonable 3-bet percentage. All in all, the 3-bet call was fine. According to Wizard it’s a 35% call after a 3-bet and in the trainer it’s 66%. I called here of course because of his ridiculous 3-bet. I also checked it afterwards in GTO Wizard which is a bit tricky because of the bet sizes but it said I played it pretty correctly. That’s nice but I still wanted to ask because at the end of the day I’m not playing against a math computer but against people. And the way you explain it SDK really makes sense to me. Thanks


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

3bet% is indeed insane high, but if it's based on 10 or 1.000 hands makes a huge difference.


Reply
Quote
pisiattu
Joined: 01.04.2010

3bet preflop imho, for isolation vs fish.
As played, I fold After squeeze, as played fold turn, as played call River but FD has improved


Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Originally posted by upsssssss
Normally I’d fold too if the villain had a reasonable 3-bet percentage. All in all, the 3-bet call was fine. According to Wizard it’s a 35% call after a 3-bet and in the trainer it’s 66%. I called here of course because of his ridiculous 3-bet. I also checked it afterwards in GTO Wizard which is a bit tricky because of the bet sizes but it said I played it pretty correctly. That’s nice but I still wanted to ask because at the end of the day I’m not playing against a math computer but against people. And the way you explain it SDK really makes sense to me. Thanks

Does this opponent play near GTO? Is he really 3betting here stuff like A2s, A3s, A4s, KQo, ATs, KTs, KJs? He might as he has high 3bet %. But as was already stated, over how big sample of hands is this? To rely on 3bet stat we need to see villain to 3bet ~250-350 times, which is ~1500-3000 hands in total. I presume your sample on this villian is rather small and his true 3bet % is much lower.

I fold preflop. Furthermore, I am more inclined to 3bet pre as people don’t defend enough by 4beting.


Reply
Quote