TT 3bet pot SB vs CO

If you bet turn and he calls, you´re likely beat most of the times and even if he has worse hand you don´t get to see showdown too often, so I like your c/c line on very draw board which I would also likely take with marginal Ax hands and TT-KK.
Your river bet is just too low. I think valuebet is fine around half pot and then folding to raise, but if you make it around 22% of pot then you likely get raised too often to bet that amount as marginal hand as TT.
c/c river might also be good option, since most players would expect you to valuebet Ax+ hands and might take stab 86s, 65s, 54s or turn some low pp-s into bluffs.

What about preflop, guys? Is 3bet a good option here?
Opponent doesn't seem to fold a lot preflop, so we are just inflating the pot with a marginal hand OOP.

And what's the plan against a 4bet?

I think 77-JJ are great bluff catchers against such a player and should be just a flat preflop. Maybe it's better to 3bet smaller pocket pairs, that doesn't play well postflop (but only if the opponent has a high fold % to cbets).

This is interesting. What do people think about call bet preflop and check/raise flop?

If villain does not fold much to 3 bets, isn't it right to 3 bet depolarised, especially OOP? If so TT is right for that purpose.

I like the idea to play TT in this case as a bluffcatcher, if the BB is not very squeeze happy of course.

Against a guy that fold so little to 3bets its too crazy to CR flop here?

As played I think that I would c/c turn and decide river depending on his river aggression. One hand that I would consider here is 65s it makes more sense to me that an slowplayed 99. River is a thin valuebet against a guy that has 19% wtsd I dont know if you are getting worst hands to call here often since this guy is so nit at river.

Ps: How much is this guy fold to flop cbet? Seems strange to fold3b=40% but wtsd of 19.