The misclick....

villain might have TT, against which you have 1 out.
if not that, villain could also have Tx drawing to quads and, as we all know, pokerstars always gives them what they need on the river.

besides that, it's also possible that villain is drawing to the royal flush, and you don't want to be the sucker who pays off a royal flush. fold is good.

All of that did cross my mind as I was going through a sarcastic post-mortem analysis of the hand in order to justify my decision. Thank you for validating my justification to what I did so I feel better.

Originally posted by Tomaloc
villain might have TT, against which you have 1 out.
if not that, villain could also have Tx drawing to quads and, as we all know, pokerstars always gives them what they need on the river.

besides that, it's also possible that villain is drawing to the royal flush, and you don't want to be the sucker who pays off a royal flush. fold is good.

Dude, just gamble here, we still have 1 out...

This is just a easy stack of with KK. If villain has quads it's just a cooler.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Yes, obviously. I was just posting this as a reminder for myself to pay more attention to not autopilot and not forget that "Fold" is on the left and "Call" is on the right. ♦

Yeah, these misclicks can be more frustrating than any bad run... 😅

Originally posted by Tomaloc
villain might have TT, against which you have 1 out.
if not that, villain could also have Tx drawing to quads and, as we all know, pokerstars always gives them what they need on the river.

besides that, it's also possible that villain is drawing to the royal flush, and you don't want to be the sucker who pays off a royal flush. fold is good.

This is a rather pessimistic evaluation, but I am bad at detecting sarcasm as well, so I'm not sure now... 😅

Reminds me of thinking about raise size on river with nuts on omaha and timing out in process. Optimal line obviously.

Originally posted by ghaleon
Reminds me of thinking about raise size on river with nuts on omaha and timing out in process. Optimal line obviously.

I timed out with Aces preflop recently. There was a 2bet and a 3bet before me, and I was trying to figure out the best 4bet size and didn't pay attention to the timer 🤦🏼‍♂️

Originally posted by SamoB25
This is a rather pessimistic evaluation, but I am bad at detecting sarcasm as well, so I'm not sure now... 😅

It is sarcasm.

Originally posted by Tomaloc
villain might have TT, against which you have 1 out.
if not that, villain could also have Tx drawing to quads and, as we all know, pokerstars always gives them what they need on the river.

besides that, it's also possible that villain is drawing to the royal flush, and you don't want to be the sucker who pays off a royal flush. fold is good.

Absolutely!
Trust your misclicks.
They are the mechanism by which the cosmic forces guide our play.
It shows that your midi-chlorians are paying attention, even when you're not.[1]
Just like misclick equity works, ( https://www.pokerstrategy.com/news/world-of-poker/Misclick-earns-poker-pro-$1-million_91166/) misclick folds also are good folds.

Do this search:

misclick equity site:PokerStrategy.com

for many more examples.

Cheers,
VS

[1] You cannot force this or fake this. Only genuine misclicks work

been there done that, I have done that a few times with nut str8's it sucks,

besides that i would 3 bet more with 2 villains in the pot preflop and being OOP postflop.

GL KEEP GRINDING

Originally posted by mkBISCUIT
besides that i would 3 bet more with 2 villains in the pot preflop and being OOP postflop.

Absolutely.
I 3bet to 5x usually in a spot like this (3x + 1x for OOP +1x per cold caller). But Villain's 2bet is already very large, so make it around 15BB, I'd say.

Originally posted by monteCarlol

Originally posted by SamoB25
This is a rather pessimistic evaluation, but I am bad at detecting sarcasm as well, so I'm not sure now... 😅

It is sarcasm.

Thanks 😅