Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/pfr/af/wts/ats/foldbb/w$sd;BB$315,04:///////;Hero$20:///////;[/tg]
0,50/1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with K♦, K♥
UTG+1 folds, Hero raises to $4,00, 6 folds, BB calls $3,00.
Flop: ($8,50) T♠, 9♦, 7♥ (2 players)
BB bets $2, Hero raises to $10,00, BB raises to $18,00, Hero raises to $16,00 (All-In).
Turn: ($42,50) J♦
River: ($42,50) Q♥
Final Pot: $42,50
Results follow (highlight to see):
BB shows [ 8s, 6s ] a straight Eight to Queen
Hero shows [ Kd, Kh ] a straight Nine to King
BB wins $2 USD with a straight, Eight to Queen.
Hero wins $37.98 USD with a straight, Nine to King.
not really a hand you could play different (though should've /could've pushed flop right away there
) but posted it because found it very funny and villain went totally berserk after sawing the result. (even though it didn't really hurt his stack)
On another sidenote, on the 3rd attempt finally starting to get a good grip at NL100 SSS and making ok profit. It's quite funny how most of the players call here with a range they would also call a big stack and seems overall way much loser than NL50 was. I play this level a bit tighter too than I played NL50, don't like to raise pockets below 8 from any position on this limit, only call if there are enough limpers, seems to work better for me this way.