Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL4 - set against straight

15 Posts
8 Users
3 Reactions
2,241 Views
Mozzek
Joined: 16.07.2016

Party, $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

UTG: $1.80 (90 bb)
MP: $4 (200 bb)
Hero (BB): $4.20 (210 bb)
SB: $4.95 (247.5 bb)
BTN: $4.11 (205.5 bb)
CO: $4 (200 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 4♥: 4♠:
UTG calls $0.04, 4 folds, Hero raises to $0.10, UTG calls $0.06

Flop: ($0.22) K♦: 2♠: 6♠: (2 players)
Hero bets $0.10, UTG calls $0.10

Turn: ($0.42) 4♦: (2 players)
Hero bets $0.40, UTG calls $0.40

River: ($1.22) 3♣: (2 players)
Hero bets $1.16, UTG raises to $1.20 and is all-in, Hero calls $0.04

Results:

Spoiler

$3.62 pot ($0.18 rake)
Final Board: K♦: 2♠: 6♠: 4♦: 3♣:
UTG showed 5♦: A♣: and won $3.44 ($1.64 net)
Hero showed 4♥: 4♠: and lost (-$1.80 net)

Hi,
villain fish: 74/14 (only 74hands)
usually I don´t cbet with pocket pairs - especially with the low ones, however here we are against fish and I guess, we might be ahead and get called. Turn completes set and as I´m against fish I bet pot size, with planning to overbet/pot size bet OTR. River is probably the worst card which could come. Now when it´s quite easy to make straight for him I was thinking about full pot and 3/4 of the pot, because I again remembered he is a fish. Can I do it, or is this 1/2 of the pot always or c/c?

And I´m sorry for stack sizes, I don´t know why but my holdem manager keeps copying it for NL2, while it´s NL4.


Reply
Quote
14 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

It is ok. Why do you leave 0.04 behind on river?


Reply
Quote
Mozzek
Joined: 16.07.2016

Originally posted by nitrol
It is ok. Why do you leave 0.04 behind on river?

Didn´t watch his stack... I always do that, have to work on that, beginners mistake.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

I think it is fine. Maybe we shouldn't go broke against fish here when any 5x has a straight but on the other hand he might have plenty of worse stuff that he will call.


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014

What's about the pre-flop raise?


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Yea that is weird. I would just check here but if we decide to iso raise it should be a lot bigger.


Reply
Quote
scopinad
Joined: 13.06.2015

At this level it is better to abandon sets on the river if straights or flushes are possible. It will impact your winrate. Raising this hand on the BB was overplayed.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

yeah, we can check preflop.


Reply
Quote
pisiattu
Joined: 01.04.2010

I check preflop as standard, if villain make many fold i can raise; as played without info i cc for bluff catching: he has k5 65 all 5x suited with spades and diamond but he has also many busted, if it is a passive player i bet 1/3-1/4 pot for fold to raise


Reply
Quote
Mozzek
Joined: 16.07.2016

Thanks guys, I always open with pocket pairs. So, what you say is just to check low pocket pairs (22-88?) OOP? And what if I´m on small blind, is it just call?


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Yes when you are on the blinds and someone limps you can just call that limp with small pocket pairs. And if someone iso-raises you can call it and set mine.


Reply
Quote
pisiattu
Joined: 01.04.2010

+1 but with 88 i raise


Reply
Quote
robin261187
Joined: 04.01.2011

I wouldn't raise preflop. Would just check. We don't need to isolate villain, since we are already isolated and our hand is not strong enough to raise for value.

On the flop, I wouldn't cbet. Villain could already be ahead with a higher pocket pair or 6x, kx, since he only limped preflop.

About betting the river, I think it's ok. It's also ok to check.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

22-66 is a check. 77+ is a raise.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Preflop is a check versus fish of this type. Let him win the small pots while you hog the big ones. Even if you can bet for value and get called by worse, you are building a big pot and will probably have to check-fold turn. Going broke with a small pair is for them (this is why they are fish), not for you.


Reply
Quote